World

Security fragile at Russian-occupied nuclear power plant in Ukraine – IAEA chief

Rafael Grossi says his visit will aim to assess the impact of recent personnel reductions.

The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is in territory under Russian military control (AP)
The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is in territory under Russian military control (AP) (Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP)

Security at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant remains fragile amid worrying recent staff cuts enacted by Russian authorities occupying the facility, the United Nations nuclear watchdog chief has said.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi, who is in Kyiv, told the Associated Press that his upcoming visit to the plant as the war approaches its two-year milestone will aim to assess the impact of recent personnel reductions after Russia denied access to employees of Ukraine’s Energoatom.

The plant is one of the 10 biggest atomic power plants in the world.

“This huge facility used to have around 12,000 staff. Now, this has been reduced to between 2,000 and 3,000, which is quite a steep reduction in the number of people working there,” Mr Grossi said.

“To man, to operate these very sophisticated big installations you need a certain number of people performing different specific functions.

“So far the situation is stable, but it is a very, very delicate equilibrium. So this is why I need to see for myself what is the situation, what are the prospects in terms of staffing, medium-term and long-term as well.”

Mr Grossi’s visit coincided with the arrival in the Ukrainian capital of the European Union’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, who said he was there to discuss military aid and financial support as well as Ukraine’s ambition of joining the bloc.

The 27 EU countries agreed last week to provide Ukraine with 50 billion euros in support for its ailing economy. But the EU’s military backing is falling short, leaving Ukraine’s forces grappling with ammunition shortages while Russia uses its economic muscle to keep up the pressure with probing ground and air attacks.

At the same time, a question mark remains over further help for Ukraine from the United States, its biggest supplier.

European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell is visiting Ukraine (Geert Vanden Wijngaert/Ap)
European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell is visiting Ukraine (Geert Vanden Wijngaert/Ap) (Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP)

That has made the early months of this year a critical juncture for Ukraine, and President Volodymyr Zelensky has indicated he is mulling a broad shake-up of the country’s leadership to bring “fresh energy” to the fight.

The IAEA has repeatedly expressed alarm about the facility amid fears of a potential nuclear catastrophe. The plant has repeatedly been caught in the crossfire since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and seized the facility shortly after.

The plant’s six reactors have been shut down for months, but it still needs power and qualified staff to operate crucial cooling systems and other safety features.

Mr Grossi said he would also check the stability of the facility’s cooling function in the wake of the Kakhovka Dam collapse over the summer, and the presence of mines in and around the plant.

The plant suffered yet another blackout last month, highlighting continuing nuclear safety concerns as battles rage nearby.

“All these things tell us that the situation in Zaporizhzhia continues to be fragile and it requires constant care,” Mr Grossi said.

Of particular concern is the Russian decision to block access for Ukrainian staff employed by Kyiv’s national operator, who refused to sign contracts with the Russian operator at the site.

The staff working at the plant now are former Energoatom workers who adopted Russian citizenship and signed new contracts with Russia’s operator at the site.

Reasons for the staff reduction vary. Some workers fled, many did not want to remain in occupied territory and those who decided to remain did not want to work for Russia.

“Some did continue working, and my Russian counterparts are telling me that they are signing up more and more people. So it’s something that we need to check,” said Mr Grossi.

The plant’s six reactors have been shut down for nearly 18 months and produce no electricity but still hold large amounts of nuclear fuel that must be cooled.

The collapse of the dam in June jeopardised access to the reservoir where water was drawn for cooling. To compensate, the plant administration dug wells.

“Now we want to see how this has evolved,” Mr Grossi said.

Rafael Grossi said he would also check the stability of the facility’s cooling function (Efrem Lukatsky/AP)
Rafael Grossi Rafael Grossi said he would also check the stability of the facility’s cooling function (Efrem Lukatsky/AP) (Efrem Lukatsky/AP)

He is to meet Ukrainian officials before heading to the plant. He is also due to travel to Moscow for talks with officials there.

Access to the entire plant facility for IAEA experts permanently based there is still limited, with Russian authorities denying requests to see certain areas.

Mr Grossi confirmed his team observed anti-personnel mines in some areas of the plant, another cause for concern that he needs to see with his own eyes. He added, however, that the mines appear to be placed between the two perimeter fences.

“We say mines at a nuclear power plant are not advisable, but what we see is that the placement and the type of mines would not pose an immediate danger to the facility,” he said.

In other developments, a Russian missile strike killed a two-month-old child and injured three women in Ukraine’s north-eastern Kharkiv region on Tuesday morning, regional authorities said.

In Russia, the defence ministry said its forces brought down all seven drones launched from Ukraine towards the country’s Belgorod region overnight.

Elsewhere, four Russian Baltic Sea ports have brought in extra security measures due to the continuing risk from Ukrainian drone attacks, according to documents published on the local port authority’s website.

Both Ukraine and Russia have increasingly relied on long-range attacks as fighting remains largely static along the 900-mile front line.