UK

Just Stop Oil activists spared jail after M25 protest

Just Stop Oil protesters were found to have breached an injunction (Aaron Chown/PA)
Just Stop Oil protesters were found to have breached an injunction (Aaron Chown/PA)

Just Stop Oil activists who caused “massive disruption” on the M25 in “deliberate defiance” of an injunction have been spared jail by a High Court judge.

Theresa Norton, 65, and Mair Bain, 36, were found to have breached the injunction when they protested on the M25 with 10 others in November 2022.

Delivering his ruling at the High Court in London on Monday, Mr Justice Soole said both defendants had crossed the custody threshold.

Just Stop Oil protests
Just Stop Oil protester Gaie Delap (far left) stands with others outside the Royal Courts of Justice (Aaron Chown/PA)

He decided not to impose any penalty against the remaining 10 defendants also found in contempt, including 76-year-old grandmother, Gaie Delap, who climbed on to an M25 gantry.

The retired teacher from Bristol previously told the judge that her “heart was breaking” for the future of her six grandchildren.

Mr Justice Soole found that she and nine of the others had not been made aware of the injunction by a Just Stop Oil mentor prior to the protest, describing the omission as a “significant failure and breach of trust”.

He handed Bain a 40-day jail sentence suspended for two years and Norton an 80-day sentence, also suspended for two years, telling the court: “Her (Bain) actions were deliberate and in defiance of the court.

“Her actions caused massive disruption to the M25 and members of the public.

“The mitigating factors include her apology and her statement explaining she would not breach court injunctions in the future.”

He described Norton’s case as “much more difficult” due to her previous conviction for being in contempt of an injunction and past comments by her explaining that she would continue to “protest regardless and defy the court”.

Mr Justice Soole took into account her statement which explained she had “no intention” of breaching court orders in the future.

Referring to the 10 defendants who had no knowledge of the injunction, he said: “It would have been a significant failure and breach of trust for JSO not to have told the volunteers of the potential consequences (of breaching the order).

“Having listened to each of these defendants my conclusion is that each of them have told the honest truth.

“I do not accept that they have lied to the court.

“It is surprising that the so-called legal brief did not give reference to existing injunctions but in my judgment it is not incredible.”