BBC bill in legal battle with Sir Cliff Richard nearly £2 million

The corporation has announced it will not pursue an appeal against a judge's ruling over its coverage of a police raid on the singer's home.

The BBC’s bill for the legal battle with Sir Cliff Richard over its coverage of a police raid on his home has reached nearly £2 million and is set to rise further.

Bosses said the corporation would not challenge a High Court judge’s ruling after it lost the case.

The 77-year-old singer sued over BBC coverage of a South Yorkshire Police search of his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire, in August 2014, following a child sex assault allegation.

David Jordan, director of editorial policy at the BBC, said he did not know how much the final bill would be.

He told BBC Two’s Newsnight: “We won’t know the entire cost of it until the judge has made some decisions in the next few months about what exactly the costs are that we should bear.

“But we do know that the cost so far in total has been £1.9 million.”

Earlier this month Mr Justice Mann ruled in Sir Cliff’s favour following a High Court trial in London.

The judge concluded the BBC’s coverage was a “very serious” invasion of the singer’s privacy and awarded Sir Cliff £210,000 damages.

He said the award would be made up of £190,000 to cover the “general effect” coverage had on Sir Cliff’s life, plus £20,000 because the BBC had aggravated harm by nominating coverage for an award.

The case has already cost the BBC nearly £2 million and the bill is set to rise further.

The BBC was refused permission to challenge the ruling by Mr Justice Mann at a hearing in July.

In a statement on Wednesday, the corporation announced it would no longer be pursuing an appeal against the judgment.

Instead, director general Tony Hall has written to the Attorney General Geoffrey Cox QC and asked him to consider a review of the law on naming people involved in police investigations.

The organisation reiterated its view that the ruling “represents a dramatic shift against press freedom”.

Mr Justice Mann previously said his judgment did not amount to a “blanket” restriction on journalists.

The BBC repeated its apology to Sir Cliff for the distress caused and said: “We fully appreciate the impact this has had on him.

“There are lessons for the BBC in how we reported this story and we will think very carefully about our approach in the future – both in tone and style.

“We recognise there are things we got wrong – even if all the facts we reported were right.”

Mr Justice Mann heard that, in late 2013, a man made an allegation to the Metropolitan Police, saying he had been sexually assaulted by Sir Cliff during an event featuring evangelist Billy Graham at Sheffield United’s Bramall Lane football stadium in 1985, when he was a child.

Metropolitan Police officers passed the allegation to South Yorkshire Police in July 2014.

Sir Cliff denied the allegation, was never arrested and in June 2016 prosecutors announced he would face no charges.

A spokesman for Sir Cliff said: “Sir Cliff reluctantly took his case to court because he felt his privacy had been flagrantly invaded and disappointingly the BBC were not prepared to acknowledge that and apologise.

“He welcomes the fact the BBC have decided not to seek permission to appeal from the Court of Appeal, particularly after the judge gave his judgment that they had no grounds on which to pursue such an action.

“Sir Cliff now hopes that outstanding issues can be resolved quickly.”

A spokeswoman for the Attorney General’s Office said the matters raised in the BBC letter do not fall within the Attorney General’s remit and it has therefore been redirected to the relevant Government departments.

Enjoy reading the Irish News?

Subscribe from just £1 for the first month to get full access


Today's horoscope


See a different horoscope: