Northern Ireland

Alleged burglar accused of targeting pensioners ‘must remain in custody'

<span style="color: rgb(38, 34, 35); font-family: utopia-std, Georgia, &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, Times, serif; ">James John Hanrahan (42) was refused bail amid claims he was involved in more than a dozen break-ins at homes across Co Down and Co Armagh&nbsp;</span>
James John Hanrahan (42) was refused bail amid claims he was involved in more than a dozen break-ins at homes across Co Down and Co Armagh& James John Hanrahan (42) was refused bail amid claims he was involved in more than a dozen break-ins at homes across Co Down and Co Armagh 

AN alleged burglar accused of targeting pensioners as part of a series of cash and jewellery heists must remain in custody, the High Court judge has ruled.

James John Hanrahan (42) was refused bail amid claims he was involved in more than a dozen break-ins at homes across Co Down and Co Armagh.

Prosecutors said 10 of the victims are aged over 60, with one incident said to involve a screwdriver being brandished.

Hanrahan, of Carnagat Park, Newry, is charged with 16 counts of burglary, one aggravated burglary and the theft of a handbag.

The alleged offences were committed at properties in Newry, Jonesborough, Forkhill, Killeavy, Warrenpoint, Silverbridge, Crossmaglen, Keady and Mullaghbawn between August 2015 and January 30 this year.

Jewellery valued at more than £9,000 was stolen, according to the charges.

Thousands of pounds in cash, another £10,000 worth of US dollars, a safe and a rifle were also taken during other burglaries, according to the prosecution.

Hanrahan is allegedly linked to the offences by DNA evidence on three cars similar to those seen in the areas of the break-ins.

An identification was also made in connection with the incident where the intruder was said to have been carrying a screwdriver, the court heard.

Defence counsel argued that no firm connection between those vehicles and the burglaries has been established.

But denying bail, Mr Justice Colton held there was a risk of re-offending.

He said: "The applicant in this case faces a series of charges in relation to burglaries, and the court is particularly concerned about the aggravated burglary that occurred on January 30."