Donald Trump loses court appeal on controversial travel ban
US president Donald Trump has lost an appeal against a court ruling blocking his travel ban on certain travellers and all refugees.
The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco instead asked both the state of Washington and the Trump administration early on Sunday to file more arguments by Monday afternoon.
The Trump administration had launched an appeal against a federal judge's ruling that temporarily placed the ban on hold. The higher court's denial of an immediate stay means legal battles over the ban will continue into the coming week at least.
Acting solicitor general Noel Francisco forcefully argued in the government's brief on Saturday night that presidential authority is "largely immune from judicial control" when it comes to deciding who can enter or stay in the United States - an assertion that invokes the wider battle to come over illegal immigration.
"The power to expel or exclude aliens is a fundamental sovereign attribute, delegated by Congress to the executive branch of government and largely immune from judicial control," the brief says.
Earlier, the government officially suspended the ban's enforcement in compliance with order of US District Judge James Robart. It marks an extraordinary setback for the new president, who only a week ago acted to suspend the US's refugee programme and halt immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries the government said raise terrorism concerns.
Mr Trump, meanwhile, mocked Judge Robart, who was appointed by president George W Bush, calling him a "so-called judge" whose "ridiculous" ruling "will be overturned".
"Because the ban was lifted by a judge, many very bad and dangerous people may be pouring into our country. A terrible decision," he tweeted.
Mr Trump's direct attack recalled his diatribes during the campaign against the federal judge of Mexican heritage who oversaw lawsuits alleging fraud by Trump University, and may prompt some tough questions as these challenges rise through the courts.
But the government's brief repeatedly asserts that presidential authority cannot be questioned by judges once the nation's security is invoked.
Congress "vests complete discretion in the president" to impose conditions on alien entry, so Mr Trump isn't legally required to justify such decisions, it says. His executive order said the ban is necessary for "protecting against terrorism," and that "is sufficient to end the matter".
The Justice Department asked that the federal judge's order be stayed pending resolution of the appeal, so that the ban can "ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism".
The order had caused unending confusion for many foreigners trying to reach the United States, prompted protests across the country and led to multiple court challenges. Demonstrations took place outside the White House, in New York and near his estate in Palm Beach, Florida, where Mr Trump was attending the annual American Red Cross fundraising gala.
"We'll win," Mr Trump told reporters on Saturday night.
"For the safety of the country, we'll win."
The State Department, after initially saying that as many as 60,000 foreigners from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia or Yemen had their visas cancelled, reversed course on Saturday and said they could travel to the US if they had a valid visa.
The department on Saturday advised refugee aid agencies that refugees set to travel before Mr Trump signed his order will now be allowed in. A State Department official said in an email that the government was "focusing on booking refugee travel" through February 17 and working to have arrivals resume as soon as Monday.
The Homeland Security Department no longer was directing airlines to prevent visa-holders affected by the ban from boarding US-bound planes. The agency said it had "suspended any and all actions" related to putting in place the order.
Hearings have also been held in court challenges nationwide. Washington state and Minnesota argued that the temporary ban and the global suspension of the US refugee programme harmed residents and effectively mandated discrimination.