News

Michael Gove: 'Unfair' to call Tories' £1bn DUP deal a bung

Michael Gove insisted a deal with the DUP was needed to ensure a "secure and stable" British government
Staff reporter

MICHAEL Gove has denied the Tories' controversial £1 billion deal with the DUP to prop up the minority Conservative government amounts to a "bung".

The new environment secretary insisted the money did not amount to a "partisan deal", despite Theresa May needing the support of the DUP's 10 MPs after losing the Tories' Commons majority in the Westminster election.

Tory backbencher Heidi Allen – who has already expressed her "distaste" at her party using public money "to garner political control" – warned that her party has become "too inward-looking" and has "forgotten the purpose".

But Mr Gove insisted a deal was needed to ensure a "secure and stable" government, and highlighted Northern Ireland's unique problems – dealing with the Troubles and needing investment in mental health and infrastructure.

Told the confidence-and-supply deal was a bung on BBC One's Andrew Marr Show, Mr Gove said: "I think that's unfair, I think that's unfair to the people of Northern Ireland and I think it's also unfair to the way in which during this negotiation decisions were taken in the interests of everyone in the United Kingdom.

"Bung is, the implication is... it implies this money is somehow going to the DUP on their own as if it were a partisan deal. It's not. It's about strengthening the whole United Kingdom by helping people in one of its most vulnerable areas."

Amid DUP opposition, the Tories have now scrapped manifesto pledges to end the triple-lock and to means-test the winter fuel allowance for pensioners.

"It's absolutely right that we should, after a general election in which we didn't secure a majority, that we should have an opportunity to review how we help the most vulnerable in our society," Mr Gove said.

Ms Allen denied she was on the edge of leaving the party, telling the programme: "I hope I'm on the edge of seeing the Conservative Party come back to the one I know can and should be there.

"We have got to change our tone and our language.

"I think we've become too inward looking, we've forgotten the purpose, why we're there, and I'm reminded constantly when talk to my constituents what they're looking for."

News

Today's horoscope

Horoscope


See a different horoscope: