News

Man (70) admits to operating an illegal dump on his wife's land in west Belfast

Hugh Corey has admitted three charges involving the unlawful deposit and keeping of controlled waste over a two year period, on a site at his Tullyrush Road home, but denies keeping the waste in a manner likely to cause pollution.
Hugh Corey has admitted three charges involving the unlawful deposit and keeping of controlled waste over a two year period, on a site at his Tullyrush Road home, but denies keeping the waste in a manner likely to cause pollution. Hugh Corey has admitted three charges involving the unlawful deposit and keeping of controlled waste over a two year period, on a site at his Tullyrush Road home, but denies keeping the waste in a manner likely to cause pollution.

A 70-YEAR-OLD Belfast man who has admitted having an illegal dump on his wife's land in the Hannahstown area of west Belfast has gone on trial accused of operating it in a way that could lead to pollution.

Hugh Corey has admitted three charges involving the unlawful deposit and keeping of controlled waste over a two year period, on a site at his Tullyrush Road home, but denies keeping the waste in a manner likely to cause pollution.

Prosecution lawyer Gareth Purvis told Belfast Crown Court that inspectors from the Northern Ireland Environment Agency first visited the site in August 2011 and found a whole raft of materials including both domestic and commercial waste and a number of skips.

Over the coming two years inspectors revisited the site and found similar controlled waste, plastics, wood, brick and concrete. Although Tullyrush Road was in the name of his wife, Corey accepted he had control and was responsible for the site.

The jury also learned that in February 2014, NIEA officers returned, this time in the company of police, and with a warrant and plant machinery to carry out what was termed "an intrusive examination" of the site.

This involved excavating eight trial pits to ascertain the extent of any problem.

An inspector said the various test holes uncovered a mixture of materials ranging from red brick, plastics, concrete, treated wood, fabrics, packaging, stones, carpets, electrics and textiles, and "lumps of other materials ... all mixed-up".

The court also heard that it was estimated that over 4.5 tonnes of waste had been dumped at the site.

Samples were taken from three of the pits and sent away for analysis.

The results indicated that some of the materials were non-inert, meaning that over the years they would continue to decay or rot away.

In a regulated land-fill site, the ground would be prepared with a membrane or other such barriers to prevent any leakage, or leeching out, from any rotting materials.

The site would also be capped to prevent rainwater getting in, and any escaping gases would be collected.

None of these measures were present at Tullyrush, which allegedly could lead to a likelihood of pollution.