News

‘Survival of the sluggish’ suggests evolution favours slackers

Lazy species that need less energy have a survival advantage, according to a new theory.
Lazy species that need less energy have a survival advantage, according to a new theory. Lazy species that need less energy have a survival advantage, according to a new theory.

The unemployed couch potato kidult still living at home at the age of 30 could represent the next stage in human evolution, according to a new theory.

A study has uncovered a previously overlooked law of natural selection based on “survival of the slacker”.

It suggests that laziness can be a good strategy for ensuring the survival of individuals, species and even whole groups of species.

And although the research was based on lowly molluscs living on the floor of the Atlantic Ocean, the authors believe they may have stumbled on a general principal that could apply to higher animals – including land-dwelling vertebrates.

Kingsman: The Golden Circle World Premiere – London
Kingsman: The Golden Circle World Premiere – London Actor Jeff Bridges, who played archetypal slacker ‘The Dude’ in the movie The Big Lebowski (Ian West/PA)

The scientists carried out an extensive study of the energy needs of 299 species of extinct and living bivalves and gastropods spanning a period of five million years.

Those that had managed to escape extinction and survived to the present day tended to be “low maintenance” species with minimal energy requirements.

Molluscs that had gone the way of the dinosaurs and disappeared had higher metabolic rates than their still flourishing cousins.

US ecologist Professor Bruce Lieberman, who co-led the  University of Kansas team, said: “Maybe in the long term the best evolutionary strategy for animals is to be lassitudinous and sluggish.

“The lower the metabolic rate, the more likely the species you belong to will survive. Instead of ‘survival of the fittest’, maybe a better metaphor for the history of life is ‘survival of the laziest’ or at least ‘survival of the sluggish’.”

The findings, reported in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, could have important implications for forecasting the fate of species affected by climate change, said the scientists.

Dr Luke Strotz, also from the University of Kansas, said: “In a sense, we’re looking at a potential predictor of extinction probability.

“At the species level, metabolic rate isn’t the be-all, end-all of extinction – there are a lot of factors at play. But these results say that the metabolic rate of an organism is a component of extinction likelihood.

“With a higher metabolic rate, a species is more likely to go extinct. So, it’s another tool in the toolbox. This will increase our understanding of the mechanisms that drive extinction and help us to better determine the likelihood of a species going extinct.”

Energy consumption had a bigger impact on species that were narrowly distributed, the researchers found.

Species with a narrowly confined range were far more likely to go extinct if they had a high metabolic rate.

Molluscs were used for the study because of the huge amount of available data on living and extinct bivalve and gastropod species.

The team now plans follow-up work to see if “survival of the laziest” natural selection applies to other kinds of animals.

Dr Strotz added: “There is a question as to whether this is just a mollusc phenomenon.

“There’s some justification, given the size of this data set, and the long amount of time it covers, that it’s generalisable. But you need to look – can it apply to vertebrates? Can it apply on land?”